<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>World of Public Affairs &#187; Intel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldofpublicaffairs.com/tag/intel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldofpublicaffairs.com</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersection of policy, politics and business at the global level.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Was Intel Screwed?</title>
		<link>http://www.worldofpublicaffairs.com/2009/08/18/was-intel-screwed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldofpublicaffairs.com/2009/08/18/was-intel-screwed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Black</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldofpublicaffairs.com/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[European Voice.com reports that an ombudsman report criticized the European Commission for &#8220;maladministration&#8221; in its recent massive fine against Intel for anti-competitive behavior. Apparently, the Commission failed to preserve an interview in which a representative of Dell claimed they used Intel chips because AMD&#8217;s chips were of poor quality. The report by the ombudsman, P. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>European Voice.com <a href="http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/2009/08/eu%27s-handling-of-intel-case-criticised/65692.aspx">reports</a> that an ombudsman report criticized the European Commission for &#8220;maladministration&#8221; in its recent massive fine against Intel for anti-competitive behavior.  Apparently, the Commission failed to preserve an interview in which a representative of Dell claimed they used Intel chips because AMD&#8217;s chips were of poor quality.</p>
<blockquote><p>The report by the ombudsman, P. Nikiforos Diamandouros, has yet to be submitted, but the Wall Street Journal wrote on 8 August that a draft it had seen criticised the EU&#8217;s officials for not keeping minutes of a meeting with an executive of the computer-maker Dell that provided “potentially exculpatory” evidence in the case. </p>
<p>The Dell executive told EU officials in August 2006 that the company had opted for Intel semi-conductors in its computers because those of its principal rival, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), were “very poor”. </p>
</blockquote>
<p> Seems to undermine the case against Intel and supports their counter-suit.&nbsp; <br />
<blockquote>Intel is currently seeking to overturn the fine at the European Court of First Instance. In July, it also filed a case against the Commission, alleging that it had violated its rights. Details of that suit have not been disclosed.</p></blockquote>
<p>This case will likely go on for a long, long time.</p>
<p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=99b9a4b1-259a-8387-8538-70163eb64598" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldofpublicaffairs.com/2009/08/18/was-intel-screwed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

